From:                                                      Water Resources Coalition [info@waterresourcescoalition.org]

Sent:                                                        Friday, April 08, 2011 9:31 AM

To:                                                            Macheska, Caroline

Subject:                                                  An Update from the Water Resources Coalition

 

To view this email as text Click here

 

 

Better logo

 

 

Water Resources Coalition eNewsletter

 

April 2011

 

In This Issue

Congressional Subcommittees Criticize Corps Budget

National Research Council Releases Report on Corps

Senators Introduce Corps Reform Act

Reclamation Releases Draft Directive and Standards

Obama Nominates Corps' Chief Engineer

US Water Shortages Spreading From Climate Change

Federal Court Allows Everglades Restoration to Continue

Federal Court Upholds California in Water Dispute

ASBPA Advocated for Corps Programs

 

 

Join The Coaltion! 

The Water Resources Coalition was established in 2007 to promote the development, implementation and funding of a comprehensive national water resources policy. With member organizations representing state and local governments, conservation, engineering and construction, ports, waterways and transportation services, the Coalition works to ensure that a comprehensive, national water resources policy is developed, implemented and funded to provide a sustainable, productive economy; a healthy aquatic ecology; and public health and safety. For more information, visit the Water Resources Coalition Web site at www.waterresourcescoalition.org.

 

 

Congressional Subcommittees Criticizes Corps Budget

Members of the Water Resources and Environment subcommittee of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee renewed their attack on federal environmental regulations at a hearing on the Fiscal Year 2012 budget of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Tennessee Valley Authority and the Natural Resources Conservation Service.

 

Subcommittee members spent a large part of the hearing criticizing the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) use of rules under the Clean Water Act that would restrict certain coal-mining practices and restore federal protections for wetlands and other waters.The subcommittee also attacked the administration for cutting federal spending for the Corps of Engineers.

 

"The FY 2012 budget request by the Administration for the Corps of Engineers is $4.6 billion.  This request is six percent less than what [the administration proposed] in FY 2011, and is the lowest request since FY 2006," said Rep. Bob Gibbs (R-OH), chair of the subcommittee.  "Given the fact that the navigation projects and the flood damage reduction projects provide economic benefits to the nation, I would like to see the Administration place a higher priority on these types of job-creating water resources investments."

 

Several members of the subcommittee questioned whether the $6.2 billion balance in the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund is available for dredging or is being used to balance the budget. While $758 million will be available for dredging, many on the panel found that funding level insufficient.  Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works, Jo-Ellen Darcy, then acknowledged that the balance will be used for deficit reduction.

 

The House T&I Water Resources Subcommittee has introduced legislation, H.R. 104, to create a firewall around the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund to protect it.  "Many of us on this committee have long felt that the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund should be spent on harbor maintenance," Representative Tim Bishop (D-NY) said. The legislation, H.R. 104, has already gained 48 cosponsors.

 

Last week the Senate Environment and Public Works Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure held a similar hearing on the proposed FY 2012 budget for the Corps. The majority of those on the Subcommittee believed that the budget falls far short of making the needed investments in ports, waterways, levees, and flood control projects. Chairman of the Subcommittee, Max Baucus (D-MT) called the President's proposal vague and commented on the lack of a plan to pay for such necessary improvements.

 

Assistant Secretary Darcy and Lt. General Robert Van Antwerp acknowledged the needs, but stated that the agency must now do the best with the budget that has been presented. During the hearing Senator David Vitter (R-LA) heavily criticized the Army Corps for what he deemed a failure to provided a single specific recommendation on how to protect coastal Louisiana from another Hurricane Katrina in the agency's $20 milion Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Report, while Senator John Barrasso (R-WY) took aim the Corp's focus on sea-level rise as an effect of climate-change.

  

In the end Senators urged Darcy and Van Antwerp to invest more heavily in ports and waterways, especially given the work underway to enlarge the Panama Canal by 2014.

 

 

National Research Council Releases Report on Corps

A National Research Council panel warns in a report released on March 25th that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is being asked to handle a growing list of complicated problems for managing water resources projects while the budget continues to shrink. The Corps asked the council to convene a committee to offer advice on how the agency might continue to function with seemingly unsustainable expectations. The report is the first in a series of five that will examine aspects of the agency's annual $5 billion, and shrinking, water resources program.

In the last two decades Congress has shifted the Corps' focus from building large water resources projects to rehabilitating aging ones. However, during this same period of time Congress has added a wish list of levees, dams, and waterways projects through legislation. The result is now a $59.6 billion backlog in authorized projects and billions more in unmet maintenance needs. To make matters worse the Corps' Civil Works Program has seen a 30 percent decline in staff since its peak in 1983.  The report concludes that long-lasting implication will be that that "nation may have to consider more flexible, innovative, and lower cost solutions to achieving water-related objectives".

It should be noted that the challenges that the Corps now faces are similar to those faced by the nation when it comes to the infrastructure deficit. With requirements increasing, demands building, and a lack of revenue to abate the problem infrastructure needs will not be able to keep up with the demand.

To view the report: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13136

 

 

Senators Introduce Corps Reform Act

Senators Jim DeMint (R-SC) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) introduced S.573, the Corps of Engineers Reform Act of 2011, on March 14th. The legislation converts the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund into a state-administered grant program with the Corps doling out funding locally under general Corps oversight. Under the reforms, project spending decisions would be made by state officials making the program locally run and without the possibility of congressional earmarks.

  

Title I of the bill would establish a Harbor Maintenance Block Grant program for states to explicitly use to carry out operations and maintenance, investigations, site infrastructure improvements, and new construction of projects pertaining to harbor maintenance or deepening.  Title II creates a new system for water resources projects to be prioritized for funding from the Corps. It establishes a non-paid eleven person panel, the Water Resources Commission, to prioritize water resources projects for selection.

  

If the legislation were to pass it would greatly alter the way the Corps selects and funds projects pertaining to harbor maintenance and water resources. Instead of relying on direction from Congress, selections would be based on the recommendations of the newly established Water Resources Commission. 

 

 

Reclamation Releases Draft Directive and Standards

The Bureau of Reclamation has released a draft Directive and Standards document, which is posted for public review, in order to strengthen its procedures for authorizing discharge of stormwater, treated wastewater, and other non-agricultural waters into facilities that are under the agency's jurisdiction.

  

The purpose of this Directive and Standard is to help ensure that the quality of non-agricultural waters discharged into Reclamation facilities does not jeopardized the exemption from National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting requirements, currently enjoyed by most Reclamation water conveyances. The hope is for the procedures to help protect the quality of water delivered to Reclamation's customers and help ensure the uninterrupted operation of Reclamation projects.  

 

The document is posted for public review at http://www.usbr.gov/recman/drafts/env06-01webdraft.pdf

 

A questions and answer information sheet is also available at http://www.usbr.gov/recman/drafts/env06-01webdraft.pdf

 

 

Obama Nominates Corps' Chief Engineer

President Obama has nominated Army Lt. General Thomas Bostick as chief engineer and commanding general for the Army Corps of Engineers. Bostick is currently the deputy chief of staff for the Army and would replace Lt. General Robert Van Antwerp, who has held the position since 2007 and is retiring.

 

 

US Water Shortages Spreading From Climate Change

A report by Tetra Tech for the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) finds that more than one- third of the counties in the lower 48 states face higher risks of water shortages by 2050 as a result of global warming.  More than 400 of the total 1,100 counties will be at very high risk for water shortages, according to the report.

 

The study used public data on current water withdrawals for different sectors of the economy, such as irrigation, cooling for power generation, and municipal supply, and estimated future demands using business-as-usual scenarios of growth.  It compared these future withdrawals to a measure of renewable water supply in 2050, based on a set of 16 global climate model projections of temperature and precipitation, to identify regions that may be stressed by water availability.   

 

The report finds that 14 states face an extreme or high risk to water sustainability, or are likely to see limitations on water availability as demand exceeds supply. The affected counties are in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Kansas, Mississippi, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas.

 

The counties identified as being at greatest risk in the report reflects a 14-times increase from previous estimates.  In addition, water withdrawal will grow by 25% in many areas of the U.S. including the arid Arizona/New Mexico area, the populated areas in the South Atlantic region, Florida, the Mississippi River basin, and Washington, D.C. and surrounding regions, according to the report.

 

A summary of the report and related links are available at  http://www.nrdc.org/globalWarming/watersustainability/files/WaterRisk.pdf.

 

 

 

Federal Court Allows Everglades Restoration to Continue

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers may proceed with a project to restore the natural hydrology of the Everglades despite the need to reduce the size of a habitat critical to the preservation of a single sparrow species, a federal court in Washington ruled this week.

 

Environmentalists sued the Interior Department in an effort to alter the critical habitat designation of the Cape Sable seaside sparrow, a designation that resulted in smaller overall habitat for the sparrow to enable the Corps to proceed with the Comprehensive Environmental Restoration Plan (CERP) approved by Congress in 2000.  The smaller habitat would not result in the sparrow's extinction, the department decided.

 

The CERP provides a framework and guide to restore, protect and preserve the water resources of central and southern Florida, including the Everglades.  It covers 16 counties over an 18,000-square-mile area and centers on an update of the Central & Southern Florida (C&SF) Project.

 

The department evenhandedly assessed the overall needs of the many species that would benefit from a restoration of the Everglades' natural habitat against potential impact of a restricted habitat for the Cape sparrow, the court ruled.

 

"The balance between designating a crucial swath of critical habitat for the sparrow, a single species, and greater flexibility for restoration of the Everglades to benefit the entire ecosystem and its many inhabiting species, is left to the Secretary's discretion as long as it does not result in extinction of the species," the court ruled in Center for Biological Diversity v. Salazar.

 

"CERP originates from the well-documented belief that the restoration process will provide a substantial benefit to the entire Everglades ecosystem, including the sparrow and other endangered species."

 

Following an 18-year court battle, five California water districts have won the right to receive all of the water from the Bureau of Reclamation that they were promised under their 1983 allocation contract with the bureau.

 

The Stockton East Water District, Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District, San Joaquin County, the City of Stockton, and the California Water Service Company provide municipal, industrial, and agricultural water, as well as the operation and maintenance of water facilities, within California's San Joaquin Valley.

 

They signed an allocation contract with the bureau in 1983 but never received all of the water to which the contracts entitled them when the bureau diverted about 25 percent of the districts' annual allocations in order to preserve California wildlife under the Endangered Species Act (ESA).

 

In 1993, the water districts sued the Bureau of Reclamation for a breach of contract over the appropriation of the water after completion of California's second largest earthfill dam, the New Melones Dam, which is part of the Central Valley Project.

 

Following a tangled series of court proceedings, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concluded in 2009 that the bureau had breached its contracts with the water districts.  The United States then sought a rehearing.  It argued that it should be allowed to prevent further evidence to support the water diversion under the ESA.

 

The Court of Appeals granted the request but reaffirmed its original ruling on March 18.  "Our further review leaves us fully satisfied that there was no absence of evidence introduced by both sides on the critical questions on which the case turns-what were the conditions that caused the breach, was there a shortage of water in any of the years at issue, caused by drought or otherwise, and ultimately who got what water and when," the court concluded in Stockton East Water District v. United States.

 

 

ASBPA Advocates for Corps Programs

After a very successful Coastal Summit in March, American Shore and Beach Preservation Association (ASBPA) members were able to take the information they gathered on Capitol Hill back home to their coastal communities.  Much of this information shed light on the highly anticipated 2011 Water Resources Development Act (WRDA) bill.  In preparation for Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works' hearings on the bill, ASBPA is drafting testimony that will help lawmakers craft a bill that improves governance of America's many water resources. 

This year, ASBPA is pushing Congress to increase the use of the highly successful Regional Sediment Management (RSM) program under the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.  Specifically, ASBPA will recommend expanding the RSM program so it may incorporate a greater range of local and regional planning factors.  This will increase the program's efficiency in planning shore protection projects.  In addition, ASBPA will be encouraging Congress to direct the Corps to change the way coastal protection projects are prioritized.  We hope that the Corps will adopt a method similar to the one used to prioritize other important flood protection projects, such as levees and dams.  Coastal water resources do much more than enhance the economic viability of a region.  We hope that the Corps will adopt a system that funds shore protection projects based on all of their benefits to society, especially their ability to protect communities from coastal storms, flooding, and erosion. 

 

A common thread running through these considerations is the concern for our Nation's growing deficit and crumbling water infrastructure.  A recent study by the Corps found that for every $1 invested to mitigate coastal storm damage, there is a savings of $7 in response and post-storm recovery costs.  ASBPA will continue to advocate for Corps programs that enhance America's water resources while lowering the long-term costs associated with these federal projects.

 

 

Sincerely,

 


Brian Pallasch and Marco Giamberardino

Co-Chairs


Water Resources Coalition

 

 

This email was sent to cmacheska@asce.org by info@waterresourcescoalition.org |  

American Society of Civil Engineers | 101 Constitution Ave, NW | Ste. 375 E | Washington | DC | 20001